<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FTC&#8217;s New Advertising Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://affiliateradio.com/112/ftcs-new-advertising-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://affiliateradio.com/112/ftcs-new-advertising-standard/</link>
	<description>The voice of truth in a sea of insanity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:47:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan</title>
		<link>http://affiliateradio.com/112/ftcs-new-advertising-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateradio.com/?p=112#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I also saw a lot of blog posts the last couple of days and I am really interested in the best way to handle that. Since I don&#039;t have the means yet to ask my own attorney I would appreciate any insight you get, Keith. 
I guess the solutions will be pretty simple. E.g. do it like Google does, have an &quot;Ads by company X&quot; sign next to any submit offers or something like that and at a little bit of wording at the right spots. 
At the end you might loose some clicks through the disclosures, but that just means we need to drive a little bit more traffic on the site to balance that out. I guess we know how to do that :-)

Cheers

Stephan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also saw a lot of blog posts the last couple of days and I am really interested in the best way to handle that. Since I don&#8217;t have the means yet to ask my own attorney I would appreciate any insight you get, Keith.<br />
I guess the solutions will be pretty simple. E.g. do it like Google does, have an &#8220;Ads by company X&#8221; sign next to any submit offers or something like that and at a little bit of wording at the right spots.<br />
At the end you might loose some clicks through the disclosures, but that just means we need to drive a little bit more traffic on the site to balance that out. I guess we know how to do that <img src='http://affiliateradio.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Stephan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://affiliateradio.com/112/ftcs-new-advertising-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateradio.com/?p=112#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Hey Keith,

I&#039;m with you on this FTC thing. I have been seeing it in the forums and group discussion boards making a &quot;mountain out of a molehill.&quot; Currently, we have a good number of websites with &quot;disclaimer&quot; and &quot;privacy&quot;  disclosures. All we have to do now is to add an &quot;integrity&quot; disclosure that our attorney can write up and insert in our sites and I think soon, it will be just another &quot;day at the office&quot; when putting up a site. The most of us are &quot;up and up&quot; and have nothing to fear.

I wouldn&#039;t lose any sleep on this!

Regards,
Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Keith,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you on this FTC thing. I have been seeing it in the forums and group discussion boards making a &#8220;mountain out of a molehill.&#8221; Currently, we have a good number of websites with &#8220;disclaimer&#8221; and &#8220;privacy&#8221;  disclosures. All we have to do now is to add an &#8220;integrity&#8221; disclosure that our attorney can write up and insert in our sites and I think soon, it will be just another &#8220;day at the office&#8221; when putting up a site. The most of us are &#8220;up and up&#8221; and have nothing to fear.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t lose any sleep on this!</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taural</title>
		<link>http://affiliateradio.com/112/ftcs-new-advertising-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>taural</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateradio.com/?p=112#comment-24</guid>
		<description>You certainly could do that. I have a friend who has a &quot;real money&quot; poker site who runs it that way. It is indeed a hassle, though. Particularly if you are earning a significant amount of money....

to misquote Tony Robbins &quot;wealth leaves clues&quot;

I play the game &quot;backwards&quot;. Since I reside in Germany there are some disclosure requirements for websites that I&#039;m not always interested in keeping (we Americans are an independent bunch). So, register and host on US servers to avoid it.

...now I&#039;m going to have to rethink all that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You certainly could do that. I have a friend who has a &#8220;real money&#8221; poker site who runs it that way. It is indeed a hassle, though. Particularly if you are earning a significant amount of money&#8230;.</p>
<p>to misquote Tony Robbins &#8220;wealth leaves clues&#8221;</p>
<p>I play the game &#8220;backwards&#8221;. Since I reside in Germany there are some disclosure requirements for websites that I&#8217;m not always interested in keeping (we Americans are an independent bunch). So, register and host on US servers to avoid it.</p>
<p>&#8230;now I&#8217;m going to have to rethink all that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
